TABLE OF CONTENTS

Volume 21, Issue 2

ACNR is a UK-based, international, open access, peer reviewed neurology journal which aims to keep busy practicing specialists up-to-date with the latest advances in their fields.

ISSN 1473-9348


Clinical Review Articles
  • Confidence College – an online education tool for neurology patients
  • Heather Angus-Leppan, Alice Caulfield, Melika M Moghim, Jennifer Nightingale, Rob Sloan, Tom Stables, Michael Oates, Bernadette Porter, Anette Schrag
Movement Disorders
  • Physical activity and exercise for people with Parkinson’s
  • Julie Jones, Katherine Baker, Bhanu Ramaswamy
Epilepsy Series
  • The Comorbidities of Epilepsy: Introduction
  • Marco Mula
  • Seizures and sleep: Not such strange bedfellows
  • Guy Leschziner
Sleep Series
  • Psychostimulants as cognitive enhancers – the evidence for the use and abuse of smart drugs
  • Poppy Goldsmith and Kirstie Anderson
Headache Series
  • Vestibular migraine
  • Nitesh Patel, Kulvinder Talewar, Anish Bahra, Diego Kaski
Special Features
  • Rehabilitating Romberg
  • Mark R Baker, Timothy L Williams, Andrew Larner
  • Arnold’s Nerve
  • JMS Pearce

Related

  • HOME
  • ISSUES
  • EXPLORE CONTENT
    • Introduction
    • Articles
    • Book Reviews
    • Case Reports
    • News
    • Sponsored Editorial
  • EVENTS
    • Introduction
    • Event News
    • Conference Reports
    • Submit your event to ACNR
  • AUTHORS
    • Introduction
    • Author Guidelines
    • Author Disclosure
  • RESOURCES
  • ABOUT
    • Introduction
    • How is ACNR funded?
    • Editorial Board
    • Peer Reviewers
    • Policies and Forms
    • Ethics and Malpractice
    • Email Newsletter
    • Mail Signup
    • ACNR Privacy Policy
This website is intended for healthcare professionals
ACNR
  • HOME
  • ISSUES
  • EXPLORE CONTENT
    • Introduction
    • Articles
    • Book Reviews
    • Case Reports
    • News
    • Sponsored Editorial
  • EVENTS
    • Introduction
    • Event News
    • Conference Reports
    • Submit your Event to ACNR
  • AUTHORS
    • Introduction
    • Author Guidelines
    • Author Disclosure
  • RESOURCES
  • ABOUT
    • Introduction
    • How is ACNR Funded?
    • Editorial Board
    • Peer Reviewers
    • Policies and Forms
    • Ethics and Malpractice
    • Email Newsletter
    • Mail Signup
    • ACNR Privacy Policy
  • Menu

ACNR ARTICLES

Burden of hospitalisation in MS: How the MS Academy will support service change

Author

  • Sarah Gillett
  • Managing Director of the Neurology Academy

Sarah Gillett is Managing Director of the Neurology Academy

Publication Dates:

Publication Date:
25 Dec 2016


Article Categories

  • ABN (5)
  • ABNT (7)
  • Alzheimer's Disease (3)
  • Australia/NewZealand (32)
  • Clinical Review (124)
  • COVID-19 (15)
  • Dementia (7)
  • Epilepsy (9)
  • Headache (4)
  • History (29)
  • Movement Disorders (3)
  • Multiple Sclerosis (16)
  • Neurological Literature (3)
  • Neurological Signs (2)
  • Neurosurgery (18)
  • Nutrition (5)
  • Pain (3)
  • Parkinson's Disease (28)
  • Personal Perspectives (2)
  • Rehabilitation (35)
  • Sleep (14)
  • Special Feature (45)
  • Stroke (11)
  • Supplements (1)

A report jointly published in November 2015 by NHiS Commissioning Excellence and the Multiple Sclerosis Trust (Thomas et al. 2015) highlights for the first time the burden that unplanned hospital care for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) places on the NHS. It vital that we explore how services for people with MS can be improved, because anecdotally we know that people with MS may not be receiving the services they need, and this is now backed up by the report’s analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics. Current failures to adequately support patients leads to unnecessary emergency hospital admissions, which could be prevented if a more proactive approach to MS management were adopted.

Measuring admissions

Approximately 90,000 people in England live with MS, and the period between 2009 and 2014 saw a steady increase in admissions to hospital. Whilst a large proportion of the elective admissions in MS will be due to the administration of disease modi­fying drugs (DMDs), the non-elective admissions are mainly a result of a problem arising.

In the year 2013/14 there were 23,554 emer­gency admissions for people with MS which cost the NHS £43 million. Despite emergency care being the minority of the total admissions into hospital, these admissions consume a dispropor­tionately large amount of the overall admissions costs. In 2013/14 only 27% of admissions for people with MS were non-elective, but these accounted for 46% of hospital care costs.

Of the 23,554 emergency admissions recorded these relate to only 14,960 unique individuals (17% of all the people with MS in England) and demon­strate that many of these emergency admissions were re-admissions. This means 37% (8,695) people are hitting the ‘revolving door’ of A&E.

Reasons for admission

Why were people with MS being admitted to hospital? Headline results from the report reveal that the most common reasons for emergency admissions were preventable problems like urinary tract and respiratory infections, constipa­tion and MS itself (including MS relapse). Bladder and bowel problems alone cost the NHS £11million among MS patients in 2013/14, whilst respiratory infections totalled in excess of £5.5 million.

Supporting MS service development

It is information like this that supports the Neurology Academy to define what areas clin­icians undertaking the MS MasterClass training should focus on for their inter-module projects.

An integral part of the MasterClass programme, which has been honed over the last 14 years, is the inter-module project. Neurologists utilise the skills and knowledge they have gained during the taught sessions by undertaking a project or in some cases a service audit within their own trust to examine local service performance. By doing this they establish how services are functioning and work on more proactive care management strategies for patients. Ultimately this leads to better services for patients, and by addressing the problems identified often reduces overall service costs.

Data intelligence from the report highlights potential areas for delegates to investigate, such as urinary tract infections (UTIs), which accounted for 14% of all emergency admissions of people with MS in England in 2013/14 and on average cost £2,556 per admission. Rates of UTIs in MS are worryingly high compared to the rate of emer­gency admissions for a UTI amongst the general population, which is under 3%. Infections are also known to aggravate the symptoms of MS and could potentially exacerbate an MS relapse so should be a real focus for action.

By MS MasterClass delegates turning their attention to UTI, and issues like it, which seriously affect the wellbeing of MS patients, the inter-module project will in many cases become the catalyst for implementing new strategies that support local service improvement. Our hope is that real change for people with MS will stem from the Academy’s innovative training programme. www.msacademy.co

Download a copy of the report “Measuring the burden of hospitalisation in multiple sclerosis: A cross-sectional analysis of the English Hospital Episode Statistics database 2009-2014” at: http://www.nhis.com/commissioning-excellence/ms-report

Related

  • Published by Whitehouse Publishing
  • The Lynch, Mere, Wiltshire BA12 6DQ, United Kingdom
  • info@acnr.co.uk
  • +44 1747 860168

FOLLOW US

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin

ACNR SIGNUPS

Join our email list to be notified when there is new content or upcoming events. For UK-based specialists join our mailing list for the journal.

© 2022 ACNR. Published by Whitehouse Publishing. Read our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Website by Sugar Web.

SIGN UP FOR OUR EMAILING LIST

Sign up to receive our email newsletter with links to the latest content. ACNR is free, thanks to the support of advertisers. The editorial content is peer reviewed and remains completely independent unless clearly specified.

For UK-based specialists, sign up for our journal mailing list.