TABLE OF CONTENTS

Volume 21, Issue 2

ACNR is a UK-based, international, open access, peer reviewed neurology journal which aims to keep busy practicing specialists up-to-date with the latest advances in their fields.

ISSN 1473-9348


Clinical Review Articles
  • Confidence College – an online education tool for neurology patients
  • Heather Angus-Leppan, Alice Caulfield, Melika M Moghim, Jennifer Nightingale, Rob Sloan, Tom Stables, Michael Oates, Bernadette Porter, Anette Schrag
Movement Disorders
  • Physical activity and exercise for people with Parkinson’s
  • Julie Jones, Katherine Baker, Bhanu Ramaswamy
Epilepsy Series
  • The Comorbidities of Epilepsy: Introduction
  • Marco Mula
  • Seizures and sleep: Not such strange bedfellows
  • Guy Leschziner
Sleep Series
  • Psychostimulants as cognitive enhancers – the evidence for the use and abuse of smart drugs
  • Poppy Goldsmith and Kirstie Anderson
Headache Series
  • Vestibular migraine
  • Nitesh Patel, Kulvinder Talewar, Anish Bahra, Diego Kaski
Special Features
  • Rehabilitating Romberg
  • Mark R Baker, Timothy L Williams, Andrew Larner
  • Arnold’s Nerve
  • JMS Pearce

Related

  • HOME
  • ISSUES
  • EXPLORE CONTENT
    • Introduction
    • Articles
    • Book Reviews
    • Case Reports
    • News
    • Sponsored Editorial
  • EVENTS
    • Introduction
    • Event News
    • Conference Reports
    • Submit your event to ACNR
  • AUTHORS
    • Introduction
    • Author Guidelines
    • Author Disclosure
  • RESOURCES
  • ABOUT
    • Introduction
    • How is ACNR funded?
    • Editorial Board
    • Peer Reviewers
    • Policies and Forms
    • Ethics and Malpractice
    • Email Newsletter
    • Mail Signup
    • ACNR Privacy Policy
This website is intended for healthcare professionals
ACNR
  • HOME
  • ISSUES
  • EXPLORE CONTENT
    • Introduction
    • Articles
    • Book Reviews
    • Case Reports
    • News
    • Sponsored Editorial
  • EVENTS
    • Introduction
    • Event News
    • Conference Reports
    • Submit your Event to ACNR
  • AUTHORS
    • Introduction
    • Author Guidelines
    • Author Disclosure
  • RESOURCES
  • ABOUT
    • Introduction
    • How is ACNR Funded?
    • Editorial Board
    • Peer Reviewers
    • Policies and Forms
    • Ethics and Malpractice
    • Email Newsletter
    • Mail Signup
    • ACNR Privacy Policy
  • Menu

ACNR ARTICLES

Improving outcomes for inpatients with Parkinson’s by reducing medical errors

Author

  • Matt Butler

Dr Matt Butler was a runner up in the Parkinson’s Academy MasterClass Project 2016. The Parkinson’s Academy intermodule project is an integral part of the Advanced MasterClass. Course participants choose an area of interest which might be around service delivery, patient or drug management and present their findings at Module 2 to the faculty and other participants who select the winner. He is StR7 GIM/Geriatrics at Hinchingbrooke Hospital in Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, UK. His main interests include falls and movement disorders but also the emerging field of acute geriatrics with an emphasis on preventing in-hospital deconditioning.

  • Correspondence Email:
  • matthew.butler2@nhs.net

Publication Dates:

Publication Date:
30 Jan 2017


Article Categories

  • ABN (5)
  • ABNT (7)
  • Alzheimer's Disease (3)
  • Australia/NewZealand (32)
  • Clinical Review (124)
  • COVID-19 (15)
  • Dementia (7)
  • Epilepsy (9)
  • Headache (4)
  • History (29)
  • Movement Disorders (3)
  • Multiple Sclerosis (16)
  • Neurological Literature (3)
  • Neurological Signs (2)
  • Neurosurgery (18)
  • Nutrition (5)
  • Pain (3)
  • Parkinson's Disease (28)
  • Personal Perspectives (2)
  • Rehabilitation (35)
  • Sleep (14)
  • Special Feature (45)
  • Stroke (11)
  • Supplements (1)

The soon to be updated 2006 NICE guidelines for Parkinson’s disease (PD) offer comprehensive advice regarding best practice for management of inpatients with Parkinson’s.1 Most importantly the guidance states that Parkinson’s drugs should not be changed suddenly or withdrawn abruptly on admission to hospital. The majority of hospital patients with PD are clerked in by doctors of grades FY1 to ST1 who may not have had practical experience of managing such patients. Recent audits have shown that even though the ‘get it on time’ message has been widely publicised for over a decade errors still occur in upward of 50% of PD inpatients.2

Aim

The aim of the programme was to take a combined approach to education for junior doctors FY1 through to ST2 combined with the roll out of a new universal drug chart acceptable for prescribing PD medications.

Method

Two 60-minute teaching sessions were delivered to each group preceded and followed by a single best answer MCQ paper to monitor improvement in knowledge base. Teaching was delivered in an open style seminar format to cater for the different knowledge base of the two groups (FYs and SHOs). The post-MCQ paper was taken 2 to 6 weeks after the end of the taught component to see if knowledge was retained. To allow the pre- and post-teaching MCQs to be able to track educational attainment each individual received a random 15 of 30 questions in Paper 1 and then completed the remaining 15 in Paper 2. Individual questions could then be compared before and after to see if there was improvement in correct responses. In addition to the taught components there was a prescribing workshop utilising the soon to be rolled out universal drug chart. This chart had 8 possible time points for prescribing each drug which rendered the old PD prescription chart obsolete. There were also separate boxes for patches to ensure compliance with specific prescribing practices for this group of medicines.

Results

Pre and Post MCQ papers
Scores improved by 18% following the taught component from 9.4/15 to 12.1/15. Improvements were seen in 23 out of 30 questions. One question showed no change as it was answered correctly 100% of the time. Six questions showed deterioration following the taught component.

Discussion

Delivery of 2 hours of teaching and prescribing workshops improves knowledge of PD and its management in inpatients by a significant margin. It can be extrapolated that this as well as the changes to the prescription chart will reduce medical error in inpatients with PD.

The majority of practical questions showed sustained improvement in correct responses. Interestingly, of the questions where scores deteriorated the topics examined were mainly around basic science or epidemiology. These did not feature prominently on the taught component or workshops but highlight that constant reinforcement of basic principles is necessary to retain such knowledge.

Actions & Recommendations

  • Regularise the taught components on the FY and SHO teaching curricula
  • Continue improvements to universal inpatient drug chart
  • Direct link on intranet now available to the OPTIMAL PD drug calculator

References

  1. Parkinson’s disease – Diagnosis and management in primary and secondary care, NICE clinical guideline 35, 2006
  2. “Get it on Time” and falls prevention strategy in Parkinson’s clinic, Dr Sudarshanie Palliyage, Advanced Parkinson’s Masterclass 29, 2016

Related

  • Published by Whitehouse Publishing
  • The Lynch, Mere, Wiltshire BA12 6DQ, United Kingdom
  • info@acnr.co.uk
  • +44 1747 860168

FOLLOW US

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin

ACNR SIGNUPS

Join our email list to be notified when there is new content or upcoming events. For UK-based specialists join our mailing list for the journal.

© 2022 ACNR. Published by Whitehouse Publishing. Read our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Website by Sugar Web.

SIGN UP FOR OUR EMAILING LIST

Sign up to receive our email newsletter with links to the latest content. ACNR is free, thanks to the support of advertisers. The editorial content is peer reviewed and remains completely independent unless clearly specified.

For UK-based specialists, sign up for our journal mailing list.