TABLE OF CONTENTS

Volume 21, Issue 2

ACNR is a UK-based, international, open access, peer reviewed neurology journal which aims to keep busy practicing specialists up-to-date with the latest advances in their fields.

ISSN 1473-9348


Clinical Review Articles
  • Confidence College – an online education tool for neurology patients
  • Heather Angus-Leppan, Alice Caulfield, Melika M Moghim, Jennifer Nightingale, Rob Sloan, Tom Stables, Michael Oates, Bernadette Porter, Anette Schrag
Movement Disorders
  • Physical activity and exercise for people with Parkinson’s
  • Julie Jones, Katherine Baker, Bhanu Ramaswamy
Epilepsy Series
  • The Comorbidities of Epilepsy: Introduction
  • Marco Mula
  • Seizures and sleep: Not such strange bedfellows
  • Guy Leschziner
Sleep Series
  • Psychostimulants as cognitive enhancers – the evidence for the use and abuse of smart drugs
  • Poppy Goldsmith and Kirstie Anderson
Headache Series
  • Vestibular migraine
  • Nitesh Patel, Kulvinder Talewar, Anish Bahra, Diego Kaski
Special Features
  • Rehabilitating Romberg
  • Mark R Baker, Timothy L Williams, Andrew Larner
  • Arnold’s Nerve
  • JMS Pearce

Related

  • HOME
  • ISSUES
  • EXPLORE CONTENT
    • Introduction
    • Articles
    • Book Reviews
    • Case Reports
    • News
    • Sponsored Editorial
  • EVENTS
    • Introduction
    • Event News
    • Conference Reports
    • Submit your event to ACNR
  • AUTHORS
    • Introduction
    • Author Guidelines
    • Author Disclosure
  • RESOURCES
  • ABOUT
    • Introduction
    • How is ACNR funded?
    • Editorial Board
    • Peer Reviewers
    • Policies and Forms
    • Ethics and Malpractice
    • Email Newsletter
    • Mail Signup
    • ACNR Privacy Policy
This website is intended for healthcare professionals
ACNR
  • HOME
  • ISSUES
  • EXPLORE CONTENT
    • Introduction
    • Articles
    • Book Reviews
    • Case Reports
    • News
    • Sponsored Editorial
  • EVENTS
    • Introduction
    • Event News
    • Conference Reports
    • Submit your Event to ACNR
  • AUTHORS
    • Introduction
    • Author Guidelines
    • Author Disclosure
  • RESOURCES
  • ABOUT
    • Introduction
    • How is ACNR Funded?
    • Editorial Board
    • Peer Reviewers
    • Policies and Forms
    • Ethics and Malpractice
    • Email Newsletter
    • Mail Signup
    • ACNR Privacy Policy
  • Menu
DOWNLOAD

ACNR ARTICLES

Making information accessible for people with aphasia in healthcare

Authors

  • Simon Grobler
  • BMedSci (Hons), MRes
  • Consultant Speech and Language Therapist

Simon Grobler is a Consultant Speech and Language Therapist with specialist interests in aphasia and cognitive-communication disorders following brain injury. He has worked in rehabilitation and outpatient services at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery since 2020.

  • Sarah Casey
  • BA (Hons), MSc
  • Highly Specialist Speech and Language Therapist

Sarah Casey is a Highly Specialist Speech and Language Therapist. She has worked at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery since 2017 and is currently working on the Neuro Rehabilitation Unit.

  • Elizabeth Farrell
  • BA (Hons)
  • Speech and Language Therapy Assistant

Elizabeth Farrell is a Speech and Language Therapy Assistant and has worked at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery since 2019. She works on the Neuro Rehabilitation Unit and SLT Outpatient services.

Correspondence Address:
Simon Grobler, Consultant Speech and Language Therapist, Therapy and Rehabilitation Services, Box 113, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.

  • Correspondence Email:
  • simongrobler@nhs.net

Conflict of Interest Statement:
None declared

Provenance and Peer Review:
Submitted and externally reviewed

Publication Dates:

Date First Submitted:
12 Oct 2021

Date Submitted after Peer Review:
22 Dec 2021

Acceptance Date:
31 Dec 2021

Publication Date:
19 Jan 2022

To cite:
Grobler S, Casey S, Farrell E. "Making information accessible for people with aphasia in healthcare." Adv Clin Neurosci Rehabil 2022;
https://doi.org/10.47795/WKDO3084

Licence:
Creative Commons Attribution License


Article Categories

  • ABN (5)
  • ABNT (7)
  • Alzheimer's Disease (3)
  • Australia/NewZealand (32)
  • Clinical Review (124)
  • COVID-19 (15)
  • Dementia (7)
  • Epilepsy (9)
  • Headache (4)
  • History (29)
  • Movement Disorders (3)
  • Multiple Sclerosis (16)
  • Neurological Literature (3)
  • Neurological Signs (2)
  • Neurosurgery (18)
  • Nutrition (5)
  • Pain (3)
  • Parkinson's Disease (28)
  • Personal Perspectives (2)
  • Rehabilitation (35)
  • Sleep (14)
  • Special Feature (45)
  • Stroke (11)
  • Supplements (1)

Abstract

People with aphasia are often unable to access healthcare due to difficulties understanding and using spoken and written language, which impacts every step of their healthcare journey and outcomes. This article argues that it is important to apply the principles of the NHS England Accessible Information Standards (2017) to people with aphasia so they can meet their health information needs and rights. The processes to enable people with aphasia to access and participate in spoken and written communication in healthcare and the methods for training and supporting healthcare staff need to be considered at an individual, service, and organisational level.


The accessible information standards (2017) state the need for organisations to ensure that individuals receive information in an accessible format and any communication support they need [1]. Whilst the accessible information standards relate primarily to people with sensory impairments and learning disabilities, this paper will outline the rationale, methods, and strategies for applying similar principles for people with aphasia.

Successful communication between healthcare professionals and patients is essential for engaging patients in their healthcare and improving outcomes [2]. Spoken communication is the medium through which information is exchanged and decisions made between healthcare professionals and their patients [2]. Written information is used to supplement education and support informed decision making [3]. People with aphasia have the same health information needs and rights as everyone else, however due to their language impairments, they are likely to struggle to understand spoken and written information [2,3]. Ineffective communication with people with aphasia can lead to frustration, exclusion from healthcare services and decision making, higher rates of medical errors and patient dissatisfaction [2,3,4]. This is further impacted by the limited knowledge, skills, and attitude of the healthcare professional [2,5].

Healthcare professionals acknowledge the challenges in communicating with people with aphasia. Communication impairments impede all healthcare activities including assessment, diagnosis, care, education, and therapy [6]. However, healthcare professionals often do not receive formal training in how to communicate with people with aphasia [2].

Consequently, written information needs to be adapted to enable people with aphasia to read with understanding [7]. Healthcare professionals should receive communication partner training interventions to enable participation of people with aphasia in their healthcare [2,8].

comorbidities of epilepsy

Making written information accessible

The aphasia literature highlights the benefits of making written information ‘aphasia friendly’. It improves the ability to read and understand written information [3,7]. It increases knowledge and improves confidence [3]. Perhaps most importantly, it is preferred by people with aphasia [9]. However, it is acknowledged that there is no definition of ‘aphasia friendly’.

A number of studies have set out to determine the criteria for aphasia friendly written material. There appears to be good consensus on the most beneficial adaptations of language, font, and formatting. Most studies agree on the need for ‘simple language’, large and sans serif fonts, highlighting key words in bold, minimising volume of text, and spacing out information [7,9,10,11]. However, the use of images and the length of adapted written material have proved more controversial. Some studies report no significant benefit of supporting written information with pictures [7]. The preference of people with aphasia varies. [3] However, the potential advantages of images are multiple and include: helping reading comprehension, adding interest, adding enjoyment, and aiding memory [9]. Consequently, most studies recommend the use of pictures unless considered unhelpful by the person with aphasia [9,10]. Length is similarly contentious. Making written information aphasia friendly tends to increase the length of the material. This is a source of complaint for some people with aphasia [3] and is considered by some to place increased demand on working memory [7]. However, it is preferred by others provided the information is formatted appropriately [10].

Communication partner training

Communication partner training is an environmental intervention that trains individuals to use strategies and communication resources in their interactions with people with aphasia [12,13,14], and possibly the person with aphasia themselves [13]. The main aim is to increase the knowledge and communication skills of those trained and to improve the participation of people with aphasia in social or healthcare conversations [13]. It has been shown to yield positive outcomes for a range of aphasia severity levels and a range of communication partners, including healthcare staff [12,13].

Communication partner training can be person-specific or generic [12]. Generic communication partner training can be used to teach healthcare staff to use supportive techniques and materials that are applicable across people with aphasia in healthcare contexts [12]. Clinicians who receive communication partner training report increased knowledge, confidence, and skills in communicating with people with aphasia [2,5,13]. Furthermore, training can lead to service-level change for the benefit of people with aphasia [5]. However, there is some suggestion that training alone is not sufficient [5,6]. Opportunity for follow-up support or coaching sessions, practice in clinically relevant situations, and making relevant resources accessible appear to drive greater implementation success in combination with favourable organisational conditions [5,14]. Organisational change and support are key given that lack of leadership, time, workplace culture, and workload pressures pose the greatest barriers to implementation of communication partner training [5,6,14].

Consequently, when healthcare professionals are asked to describe their needs for communicating with people with aphasia, they ask for [8]:

  • Increased knowledge of aphasia
  • Increased skills in engaging with people with aphasia and training to use communication techniques and tools
  • Organisational change such as provision of more time and adapting resources so they are aphasia friendly
  • Changing the role of Speech & Language Therapists to provide training, act as role models, provide in-situ coaching, and make communication tools that are accessible to all healthcare professionals.

The role of SLTs in providing training, advocating for people with aphasia, and providing ongoing support is highlighted elsewhere in the literature [2,15].

Many communication partner training programmes have their origin in ‘Supported Conversations for Adults with Aphasia’ (SCA), which provides the communication partners with the methods and materials needed to support conversations with people with aphasia [15]. SCA advocates for communication partners acting as a resource for people with aphasia and to actively share responsibility for communication success [15]. Table 2 outlines some possible supported communication strategies from SCA [15].

Conclusion

In conclusion, making information accessible for people with aphasia in healthcare needs to be a key priority at an organisational level. The above overview of the literature has identified that due to inaccessibility of information, people with aphasia are not having their healthcare needs and rights met; this is impacting all their healthcare activities and outcomes. The literature also acknowledges the challenges faced by healthcare workers when giving spoken and written information to people with aphasia. To address this, the role of Speech and Language Therapists should evolve to encompass provision of training and support to healthcare workers to meet these needs. This will ensure that people with aphasia are able to access healthcare information equitably alongside everyone else.


References

  1. NHS England. Accessible Information: Specification v.1.1. 2017. https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/accessible-information-standardspecification/
  2. Burns MI, Baylor CR, Morris MA, McNalley, Yorkston KM. Training healthcare providers in patient–provider communication: What speech-language pathology and medical education can learn from one another. Aphasiology. 2012:26(5);673-688. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2012.676864 
  3. Rose T, Worrall, L, McKenna, K. The effectiveness of aphasia‐friendly principles for printed health education materials for people with aphasia following stroke. Aphasiology. 2003:17(10);947-963. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030344000319
  4. Bartlett G, Blais R, Tamblyn R, Clermont RJ, MacGibbon B. Impact of patient communication problems on the risk of preventable adverse events in acute care settings. CMAJ. 2008;178(12):1555-62. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.070690 
  5. Simmons‐Mackie NN, Kagan A, O’Neill Christie C, Huijbregts M, McEwenm S, Willems, J. Communicative access and decision making for people with aphasia: Implementing sustainable healthcare systems change. Aphasiology 2007:21(1);39-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600798287
  6. Van Rijssen MN, Veldkamp M, Bryon E, Remijn L, Visser-Meily JMA, Gerrits, E, van Ewijk L. How do healthcare professionals experience communication with people with aphasia and what content should communication partner training entail? Disability and Rehabilitation 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1878561 
  7. Brennan A, Worrall L, McKenna. The relationship between specific features of aphasia-friendly written material and comprehension of written material for people with aphasia: An exploratory study. Aphasiology. 2005:19(8);693-711. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030444000958 
  8. Van Rijssen M, Veldkamp M, Meilof L, van Ewijk L. Feasibility of a communication program: improving communication between nurses and persons with aphasia in a peripheral hospital. Aphasiology. 2019:33(11);1393-1409. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1546823 
  9. Rose TA, Worrall LE, Hickson LM, Hoffmann, TC. Aphasia friendly written health information: Content and design characteristics, International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2011:13(4);335-347. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2011.560396 
  10. Rose TA, Worrall LE, Hickson LM, Hoffmann, TC. Guiding principles for printed education materials: Design preferences of people with aphasia. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2012:14(1):11-23. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2011.631583 
  11. Herbert R, Gregory E, Haw C. Collaborative design of accessible information with people with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2019:33(12);1504-1530. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1546822 
  12. Simmons-Mackie N, Raymer A, Cherney LR. Communication Partner Training in Aphasia: An Updated Systematic Review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2016;97:2202-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.023
  13. Cruice M, Blom Johansson M, Isaksen J, Horton S. Reporting interventions in communication partner training: a critical review and narrative synthesis of the literature. Aphasiology. 2018:32(10);1135-1166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1482406 
  14. Shrubsole, K, Lin TJ, Burton C, Scott J, Finch E. Delivering an iterative Communication Partner Training programme to multidisciplinary healthcare professionals: A pilot implementation study and process evaluation. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 2021:56;620-636. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12618
  15. Kagan A. Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: methods and resources for training conversation partners. Aphasiology. 1998:12(9);816-830. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039808249575 

Related

  • Published by Whitehouse Publishing
  • The Lynch, Mere, Wiltshire BA12 6DQ, United Kingdom
  • info@acnr.co.uk
  • +44 1747 860168

FOLLOW US

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin

ACNR SIGNUPS

Join our email list to be notified when there is new content or upcoming events. For UK-based specialists join our mailing list for the journal.

© 2022 ACNR. Published by Whitehouse Publishing. Read our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Website by Sugar Web.

SIGN UP FOR OUR EMAILING LIST

Sign up to receive our email newsletter with links to the latest content. ACNR is free, thanks to the support of advertisers. The editorial content is peer reviewed and remains completely independent unless clearly specified.

For UK-based specialists, sign up for our journal mailing list.